On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 01:52:05PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 01:49:02PM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote: > > I asked you to give informations about what is giving troubles, > > now you reference something I never heard of before. > > What is the fedora extras steering committee ? Pointers ? First time I > > heard about it. > > <http://www.google.com/search?q=fedora+extras+steering+committee> > > > Maybe I'm just off track, but there is a complete lack of clarity > > around all this at least from my perspective. > > By "all this" do you mean Fedora in general, or Fedora Extras, or what? about the technical work which need to be done and which need to change the Fedora cycle durations. What, who, when, how long, and why this can't be done in parrallel ? All I'm getting is "we need longuer cycles" and still not understanding. BTW I'm not represnting Red Hat position, just an engineer trying to understand some engineering plumbing and not getting it. Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Desktop team http://redhat.com/ veillard@xxxxxxxxxx | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
