Re: What next?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ian Pilcher wrote:
Matthew Miller wrote:

If RHEL doesn't qualify, then that would be an additional restriction
forbidden by the GPL. Some-other-licensed MP3 player might get by with this,
though. (However, it's not really in the spirit of Free / open source
software.)


Which means that it couldn't be included in Fedora (Core or Extras)
either.

This doesn't look obvious to me. I know the way the GPL and Patents interact is always a source of debate, but the GPL specifies "If, as a consequence of a court judgment or allegation of patent infringement..., conditions are imposed on you (whether by court order, agreement or otherwise) that contradict the conditions of this License...". The whole point here would be to get Fraunhofer to give 'written promise' to not sue the newly founded non-profit Fedora Foundation, then there will not be any 'court judgments' or 'allegations' to speak of that would bother the GPL... See this interesting read at http://www.phptr.com/articles/article.asp?p=353550&seqNum=14&rl=1

-denis



--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux