Hi Frédéric,
I think this is indeed the right choice and probably the more relevant info with respect the original source file. If you need some help for testing/fixing that, please don't hesitate. I would be happy to help. I'm also on IRC #fedora-devel.
Are you able to test using F34 rpms ? I have updated annobin package for F34, but due to the block on package updates getting the stable tag it is not yet present in the official repository. But you can download the 9.65-1.fc34 build from here: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1721032 My testing showed that looking for a period in the filename was not reliable however, so instead I have just gone for a fixed filename (annobin_lto). I *hope* that this will not cause problems with big builds using lots of object files, but if you do encounter any problems please let me know. Cheers Nick PS. The rawhide annobin has not been updated because of a problem with clang's c++ headers. I am waiting for this bug to be fixed... _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
