On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 09:15:23AM +0000, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > On Tue, 9 Mar 2021 at 06:57, Ondrej Dubaj <odubaj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > If any concerns about the autoconf2.69-2.69 compat package ? If needed it > > can be implemented as non-parallelly instalable, > > > > Really .. instead wasting time on packaging stuff which is ~7 years old it > would be better to use that time to fix one of those handful packages which Well the reason why it is 7 years old is there weren't any updates, so I think we should expect a reasonable amount of time to pass before upstreams transition. Like I said earlier, for parted we're not going to change until 2.71 is widely available, so I need something that either works with both or a compatibility package. > So .. anyone knows any other packages dist sources trees on which something > like "autoreconf -fiv" fails? THIS is what I needed. I hadn't tried -i so I continued to get failures when I worked on this a few weeks back. Adding -fiv did the trick and parted-3.4-3.fc35 will work with 2.69 or 2.71 so I no longer need the compatibility package, thanks. I still think having 2.69 is necessary though, and we should revisit convincing upstreams to use 2.71 after F36 or so. Brian -- Brian C. Lane (PST8PDT) - weldr.io - lorax - parted - pykickstart _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
