Thanks for your notes. If wanted, the first version of autoconf2.69-2.69 compat package is available in copr for testing. This is a version which is parallelly installable with autoconf-2.71. Please check/update your packages and rebuild them.
Thanks. Regards,
Ondrej
On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 2:45 PM Kevin Kofler via devel <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Miro Hrončok wrote:
> 1) Why 269 and not 2.69?
I guess that this is a historical thing: past autoconf compatibility
packages always had names such as autoconf213. Back then, dots in package
names were considered unusual or harmful, standard practice was to omit
them. The rule that the dot should be included was added relatively recently
(but already a couple years ago by now) to the packaging guidelines.
Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
