On 03. 03. 21 12:49, Ondrej Dubaj wrote:
Compat package prepared. Package autoconf269-2.69-1 provides: /usr/bin/autoconf269 /usr/bin/autoheader269 /usr/bin/autom4te269 /usr/bin/autoreconf269 /usr/bin/autoscan269 /usr/bin/autoupdate269 /usr/bin/ifnames269 ... Parallel installation successful. Any suggestions/concerns are welcome.
My concerns are: 1) Why 269 and not 2.69? 2) Is the parallel installability worth the trouble of different names? -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
