On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 01:11:55PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > In any case, I'm not convinced mass branching is ever going to work for > epel. Although I suppose as more packages have the epel packager sig > group on them, that group could work on faster adding piles of packages. > Perhaps we should try and identify all the 'please branch for epel' > requests in bugzilla and have some way for the epel packager sig to step > in and get those added? I have a couple of packages which I find handy to have in EPEL -- little command line utilities, mostly -- and which have very little change over time and which I'm 99.9% will just build on EPEL 9. My EPEL maintenance policy is basically "build once when there is a new EPEL, plus also in the rare chance of an update which seems significant, or if someone asks". So for me, having these automatically branched and auto-built (once) whenever there's a new EPEL would be ideal. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
