Re: Fedora 35 Change: rpmautospec - removing release and changelog fields from spec files (System-Wide Change proposal)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02. 03. 21 22:05, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
The devil is in the details: pre-release, snapinfo, minorbump aren't really
covered by distance being just an integer bumped.

I don't see this covered in the current method either. Or was it in the meantime? Anyway:

- pre-release should go into version (~)
- snapinfo should go into version (~ or ^)

The only real problem I see here is minorbump. We could have something like: %{autorel -m}. That means, micobump since this was added here. But I guess it is ugly.

I know we considered the "number of commits since the last version bump" when we
looked into this. I honestly do not remember precisely why we didn't go with it.

IIRC it was because you considered building several rebuilds with different releases from the same commit a goal (while I'd rather require an empty commit that explains the reason for the rebuild).

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux