Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> Is there some reason systemd-resolved cannot be a subpackage? Seems
> like that would be the easiest solution?
+1 to making this a subpackage. I really don't see why this has to be part
of the main systemd package.
There are other optional parts of systemd that should also really be in
subpackages. E.g., why do we install bootctl by default when Fedora does not
actually use systemd-boot by default, but shim and GRUB?
Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
