On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 18:04, Adam Williamson <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 2021-02-11 at 09:55 +0100, Clement Verna wrote:
> >
> > So, what do folks think? Does this seem like a good idea? Should I go
> > ahead with trying to get it deployed and onboard things to it? Any
> > comments, ideas, potential problems? Thanks!
> >
>
>
> I am pretty sure you did :-) but have you looked at adding the missing
> information to Bodhi ? Now that we have rawhide in Bodhi we should be able
> to expose most the information needed.
I didn't look at that in any technical detail but conceptually it seems
kinda wrong to me. The problem with using any existing system is that
all existing systems are *for* something. Bodhi is for dealing with
updates. There's no reason why Bodhi would track, for instance, whether
34 is under a string freeze, right? Because Bodhi doesn't have anything
to do with translations. There are a zillion other 'states' that it
would be useful to have info on which aren't relevant to any *one*
existing system, and that's why to me it makes sense to have a separate
thing for that.
I was wondering about the 4 Needs bullet points in your original email which could be in Bodhi but yes if we want to add more and more info a seperate app makes sense :-)
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA
IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha
https://www.happyassassin.net
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
