On Thu, 2021-02-11 at 09:55 +0100, Clement Verna wrote: > > > > So, what do folks think? Does this seem like a good idea? Should I go > > ahead with trying to get it deployed and onboard things to it? Any > > comments, ideas, potential problems? Thanks! > > > > > I am pretty sure you did :-) but have you looked at adding the missing > information to Bodhi ? Now that we have rawhide in Bodhi we should be able > to expose most the information needed. I didn't look at that in any technical detail but conceptually it seems kinda wrong to me. The problem with using any existing system is that all existing systems are *for* something. Bodhi is for dealing with updates. There's no reason why Bodhi would track, for instance, whether 34 is under a string freeze, right? Because Bodhi doesn't have anything to do with translations. There are a zillion other 'states' that it would be useful to have info on which aren't relevant to any *one* existing system, and that's why to me it makes sense to have a separate thing for that. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha https://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
