On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 09:04:12AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2021-02-11 at 09:55 +0100, Clement Verna wrote: > > > > > > So, what do folks think? Does this seem like a good idea? Should I go > > > ahead with trying to get it deployed and onboard things to it? Any > > > comments, ideas, potential problems? Thanks! > > > > > > > > > I am pretty sure you did :-) but have you looked at adding the missing > > information to Bodhi ? Now that we have rawhide in Bodhi we should be able > > to expose most the information needed. > > I didn't look at that in any technical detail but conceptually it seems > kinda wrong to me. The problem with using any existing system is that > all existing systems are *for* something. Bodhi is for dealing with > updates. There's no reason why Bodhi would track, for instance, whether > 34 is under a string freeze, right? Because Bodhi doesn't have anything > to do with translations. There are a zillion other 'states' that it > would be useful to have info on which aren't relevant to any *one* > existing system, and that's why to me it makes sense to have a separate > thing for that. The other problem that comes from this is: When we are 'go' for a new release, we start pushing '0-day' updates. Usually this is the day after the 'go' decision and a week or two ahead of the actual release. At that point bodhi thinks the release is "released", even though it is not. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
