On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 09:22:54PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > Ben Cotton wrote on 2021/02/11 0:44: > >In accordance with the new FESCo policy[1] the following > >provenpackagers will be submitted for removal in two weeks based on a > >lack of builds submitted in the last six months. If you received this > >directly, you can reply off-list to indicate you believe you should > >still have provenpackager status. > > > >This is the first time we have done a regular audit of the > >provenpackagers group, so please be patient with any hiccups in the > >process. This will be done regularly at the branch point in each > >release. > > > >[1] https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2549 > > > >Checked 252 provenpackagers > >The following 117 provenpackagers have not submitted a Koji build > >since at least 2020-08-05 00:00:00: > > A question from me as a worrier: > > How will become the status of provenpackagers whose sponsor (as > provenpackager role) is one of the persons listed here to be removed? > Just the sponsor of such person will be changed to NONE? I hope it will not change. Though this matters mostly for historical reasons: I think the old idea of sponsors being forever responsible for their sponsorees is very far from current practice. Once the sponsorship happens, the sponsor doesn't matter much anymore. Zbyszek _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
