> What is the vision for grub2 package in Fedora versus upstream grub? The > huge amount of patches in Fedora's grub (279 at this time) makes it > basically a fork. And indeed many parts are incompatible with upstream > grub, like "increment" module, or BLS, just to name a few. I know it's > problematic when you run Fedora VM on non-fedora Xen host if you use > pvgrub/pygrub - in that case it uses host's grub to parse guest grub.cfg > and load the actual kernel. But I'm pretty sure there are other > problematic cases too. > > Is there any specific reason why those patches are not upstream, or just > nobody had time to do it? If the latter, can I help with this somehow? Upstream was inactive for a long time, there are patches going upstream now but it's a slow process. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
