Hi, What is the vision for grub2 package in Fedora versus upstream grub? The huge amount of patches in Fedora's grub (279 at this time) makes it basically a fork. And indeed many parts are incompatible with upstream grub, like "increment" module, or BLS, just to name a few. I know it's problematic when you run Fedora VM on non-fedora Xen host if you use pvgrub/pygrub - in that case it uses host's grub to parse guest grub.cfg and load the actual kernel. But I'm pretty sure there are other problematic cases too. Is there any specific reason why those patches are not upstream, or just nobody had time to do it? If the latter, can I help with this somehow? -- Best Regards, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki Invisible Things Lab
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
