Re: [ELN] How to handle RHEL-specific changes when it fails in ELN?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Florian Weimer wrote:
> This is closer to the existing policy, I think:
> 
> <https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#bundling>

Actually, the very first 2½ sentences at that link make my point even more 
clearly than the link I had posted:

| Fedora packages SHOULD make every effort to avoid having multiple,
| separate, upstream projects bundled together in a single package.
|
| All packages whose upstreams allow them to be built against system
| libraries MUST be built against system libraries.
|
| All packages whose upstreams have no mechanism to build against system
| libraries MAY opt to carry bundled libraries, […]

I do not see with what justification you want to argue that this Rust 
package has no upstream mechanism to build against system libraries, 
considering that there is a non-vendored tarball.

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux