"Colin Walters" <walters@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Fri, Jan 15, 2021, at 9:47 AM, Simo Sorce wrote: >> >> There is of course no problem to have it in Fedora, but if this is >> something that is going to end up in RHEL one day, it would be better >> to do the work now to make it use OpenSSL rather than scramble later. > > Isn't it at least part of the purpose of Fedora ELN to detect > situations like this earlier? A dependency on boringssl in the Fedora > "Everything" repositories is a distinct thing from it in ELN. Part of the problem is that boringssl isn't a separate package - it typically gets bundled. (This causes mysterious failures because boringssl stomps on the openssl names.) So there wouldn't be a dependency to detect. Thanks, --Robbie
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
