On Fri, Jan 15, 2021, at 9:47 AM, Simo Sorce wrote: > > There is of course no problem to have it in Fedora, but if this is > something that is going to end up in RHEL one day, it would be better > to do the work now to make it use OpenSSL rather than scramble later. Isn't it at least part of the purpose of Fedora ELN to detect situations like this earlier? A dependency on boringssl in the Fedora "Everything" repositories is a distinct thing from it in ELN. If there was a change that brought it into ELN, AFAIK the ELN builds wouldn't fail, presumably we'd want to treat it as an important bug and possibly drive reverting the change in "Everything" or so, right? Similarly, we definitely would try really hard to avoid adding another crypto library to Fedora CoreOS. So I think the use of the bare term "Fedora" here isn't right. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
