On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 08:24:03AM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 12:52 am, Kevin Kofler via devel > <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >Do the boringssl symbols not have hidden visibility in libwebrtc? > >If they > >do, why are they getting interposed anyway? If they don't, why > >not? I assume > >the library is private to libwebrtc and its symbols should not be > >exported. > > libwebrtc is a static lib, and so is boringssl. So all symbols, > except unused symbols, will be directly included in libwebkit2gtk. > In release builds, they would then be hidden by a linker script, but > in developer builds everything is exported because API tests depend > on internal symbols. Would it be possible to get rid of boringssl? Having yet another crypto library is ... bad. Zbyszek _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
