Re: Chromium built in rawhide does not render most strings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Florian Weimer wrote:
> It's not.  It may be a completely different system call.

So now I had a new idea how to figure out what difference the version of 
glibc we are compiling against can make: track down the symbol version:
nm -D --with-symbol-versions Downloads/libQt5WebEngineCore.so.5.15.2 | grep 
'@GLIBC_2\.33'
                 U fstat64@GLIBC_2.33
                 U fstatat64@GLIBC_2.33
                 U lstat64@GLIBC_2.33
                 U stat64@GLIBC_2.33

So we are getting new symbol versions of the above 4 functions. So now we 
only need to know what is different between the above and the syscalls 
presumably used previously:
nm -D --with-symbol-versions Downloads/libQt5WebEngineCore.so.5.15.1 | grep 
'stat\(at\)\?64'
                 U __fxstat64@GLIBC_2.2.5
                 U __fxstatat64@GLIBC_2.4
                 U __lxstat64@GLIBC_2.2.5
                 U __xstat64@GLIBC_2.2.5
(That's the version from F33 GA, definitely built against an older glibc.)

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux