Re: Proposal: gate stable release critical path updates on openQA test results

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Matthew Miller wrote:
> And, also hopefully also a rare occasion, but if this were enabled (and
> the definitions up to date), problems like
> 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/thread/CAS6KHTZLR6LUNWEVK3BOIO6HVNQDETZ/#N5HJDKMTGOTL44BT2HZ43LE6Q23345IQ
> would be caught before they hit users.

This issue was a result of using autopush. See also:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-5da509fd8e#comment-1807700
A maintainer would normally not manually push an update before the library 
update it depends on, the autopush logic was what made that accident happen.

Another autopush issue has just happened on F32:
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9943

We don't need more automagic, it will only make things worse. We need 
sentient beings taking care of pushes.

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux