On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 07:40:07AM -0600, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@xxxxxxxxxx> said: > > If the bumps were due to insufficient documentation (e.g. the > > ntp-refclock man page), would you have any suggestions on how to > > improve it, or submit a patch? > > Since I'm using a refclock that doesn't handle PPS, I have chronyd > configured to use /dev/pps0. In that case, the example systemd unit in > the ntp-refclock man page can't work, because chronyd expects /dev/pps0 > to exist when it starts (or it'll just exit). The ordering has to be > PPS setup, then chronyd, then ntp-refclock. I see. That could be a third example (using the PALISADE driver) in the man page. > It would be nicer if ntp-refclock just included the systemd unit and > used a config to get the options (e.g. /etc/sysconfig/ntp-refclock), and > maybe even the PPS setup unit. Obviously the udev rules are device > specific, but it might be good to include an example in the docs > directory. Good idea. Added to my todo list. Thanks, -- Miroslav Lichvar _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
