On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 9:58 PM Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 01:39:26PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > So that proposal was just for all packagers. I think it should at least > > be reasonable to set a relatively high bar for being a provenpackager. > > That predates the existance of the provenpackager group, so yeah. ;) > > > Proven packagers really should be people who are deeply involved in > > Fedora work on a daily basis, I think, and so should be able to respond > > to a regular check-in process like this or the one bcotton proposed. > > And the result would only be that they'd lose provenpackager > > privileges, which could quite easily be restored if it turned out > > they'd just gone on a yak farming retreat for a bit or something. > > Perhaps it could just be 'hey, go do a scratch build and you will drop > off the list to be dropped'. I personally don't think that's a high enough bar to retain proven packager, I think people should be actively involved in the project. > Or possibly related to this, we could send everyone a email on their fas > birthday, asking them to look at what groups they are involved with and > adjust (a yearly bit of introspection we could all probibly do with). That doesn't work TBH, people don't actively drop privs "just in case", we should have some real stats behind this, we're better off being active in the adjustment of things like this rather than attempting to bold the gate shut long after the horses have bolted! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
