On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 01:39:26PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > So that proposal was just for all packagers. I think it should at least > be reasonable to set a relatively high bar for being a provenpackager. That predates the existance of the provenpackager group, so yeah. ;) > Proven packagers really should be people who are deeply involved in > Fedora work on a daily basis, I think, and so should be able to respond > to a regular check-in process like this or the one bcotton proposed. > And the result would only be that they'd lose provenpackager > privileges, which could quite easily be restored if it turned out > they'd just gone on a yak farming retreat for a bit or something. Perhaps it could just be 'hey, go do a scratch build and you will drop off the list to be dropped'. Or possibly related to this, we could send everyone a email on their fas birthday, asking them to look at what groups they are involved with and adjust (a yearly bit of introspection we could all probibly do with). kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
