Re: Modularity documentation [was Re: The future of Fedora Server...] Fedora CoreOS a Fedora Edition (System-Wide Change))

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Tue, Dec 8, 2020, 3:18 PM Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 08:02:01AM -0700, James Szinger wrote:
> I find the modularity end-user documentation to be woefully
> inadequate, especially for developers.

Is there a particular part of the documentation you're struggling with, or
something specifically you find missing? I don't mean to be snarky, but I
heard a lot of this complaint at the last DevConf.cz, and then when the
things mentioned were checked out, they actually _are_ covered pretty nicely
in the https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/modularity/ docs.


Hi Matt, I opened https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/modularity/issue/74 about the docs.

We're still using "calc" in the examples, and "lorim ipsum", etc.

Which module in Fedora today is the best example of modularity? That one would be a good one to use in the docs.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux