Adam Williamson <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Mon, 2020-11-30 at 00:24 +0100, Dan Čermák wrote: >> Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> Now, this does not mean that we shouldn't test audio in Fedora's openQA >> (we don't atm), as that is still a valuable regression test. But we >> won't be able to cover a lot of the more interesting use cases where I >> would expect [2] that most of current the bugs are. Those will only get >> found by running this on real world hardware by folks that have their >> working setups. > > Yeah, I looked into it before and this is basically why I didn't bother > implementing it; it doesn't buy us much more than we're getting > naturally from human testing anyway. Well, except that a human needn't lift a finger anymore to check if there's actually sound coming out of vlc/mpv/firefox/etc. ;-). Now checking whether that's actually the sound that you expect or whether it has the correct volume is an entirely different story of course and I'm afraid that's something where we'll have to rely on humans or $shinyMlAiSolutionThatSolvesAllOurProblems. Cheers, Dan
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
