* Fabio Valentini: > Are there plans to fix the glibc faccessat2 issues with older > systemd-nspawn and docker? > It would be a shame if fedora 34 containers wouldn't be able to run > correctly in most circumstances. I've brought the discussion to what I think are the appropriate forums: <https://lore.kernel.org/linux-api/87lfer2c0b.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/> <https://groups.google.com/a/opencontainers.org/g/dev/c/8Phfq3VBxtw> I've also posted a glibc upstream patch to show what it would look like: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2020-November/119955.html> Personally, I find it difficult to support such an approach technically, and I would like to see some reassurance from kernel developers that this is okay. Feedback so far is in the opposite direction, though. Thanks, Florian -- Red Hat GmbH, https://de.redhat.com/ , Registered seat: Grasbrunn, Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243, Managing Directors: Charles Cachera, Brian Klemm, Laurie Krebs, Michael O'Neill _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
