On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 at 21:31, Adam Williamson <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 2020-11-23 at 15:11 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > I would highly recommend not creating message consumers that rely on
> > any particular message ordering because they're not going to work
> > properly, GitLab or not.
>
> Too late, pretty much every consumer I'm aware of relies on having
> chronological order or at least some way to sort them chronologically
> for processing for messages.
I don't think any consumer I've written does. They all just work on the
basis "a thing happened; do some things relevant to the thing that
happened".
Honestly my feeling is that most of our consumers fall into that category , I can't think of a use case where the chronological order matters (I have been told CI might, but I don't know the exact use case).
If anyone has a concrete example, I would welcome it very much so that we can use it as a test case with GitLab.
If anyone has a concrete example, I would welcome it very much so that we can use it as a test case with GitLab.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA
IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha
https://www.happyassassin.net
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
