Hi, I thought this Change was exciting to see, even if it has some room to improve as pointed out earlier in the thread. On 11/21/20 6:43 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > I think we'd be most interested in practical user experience issues, > like the ones that Alexander has mentioned already. Particularly if > there is a bug report. An alternative to `pavucontrol` is something we discussed in the i3wm SIG. Currently we find it to be the most intuitive graphical interface available for managing audio devices and streams. One thing I would like to see (without having looked very hard yet) is to know what the migration impact is for end-users moving from PulseAudio controller tools and interfaces to PipeWire. On 11/21/20 7:00 PM, Brandon Nielsen wrote: > I would be a lot happier if there was a documented way to enable this > for F32 / F33 so the brave could try living with it for a prolonged > period of time. Me too! I know I would probably try this out on my personal Workstation i f I had some good docs on how to migrate it. Especially with some kind of estimate of time needed to complete, so I can measure how long before I will need a functioning audio stack to jump into a video call where people need to hear/see me. ;) -- Cheers, Justin W. Flory (he/him) https://jwf.io TZ=America/New_York
Attachment:
publickey - foss@jwf.io - 570e854f.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
