On 06.11.20 13:00, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
Sandro Mani wrote:
But I'll also expand the analysis to the entire qt4 stack and see what
comes out.
Dropping the entire Qt 4 stack is a non-starter. I am keeping the qt4
package secure with backported security fixes. I see no reason to drop it.
Qt4WebKit is a different matter, though I shall point out that:
* We already have plans to phase out Qt4WebKit, and there is a bug to track
it.
* I do not see why we need your change page that only duplicates the tracker
bug.
* I also do not see why you want to file that change page without first
talking to the maintainers of the affected packages (in particular, me).
* You also unilaterally decided in your plan to retire some packages
(kdepim4/knode, krecipes) that I maintain and for which I already have
different plans.
* You also unilaterally decided in your plan to retire kde-workspace, which
should not be necessary either.
Go easy there, I hit a problem, and proposed an analysis and a solution,
posting it as draft with a request for feedback. No one unilateraly
decided anything, as no decision has been taken.
Sandro
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
