Re: Packaging rules for build from source vs BPF byte code ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 3:49 AM Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> In QEMU there's a desire to make use of BPF programs for implementing
> some networking features. The current patches are proposing adding
> prebuilt BPF byte code to the QEMU repo, with source available, but
> not actually building from source during a build.
>
> I was wondering if we had any specific guidance or rules covering the
> shipping BPF programs in particular ?

I wonder if this trend in BPF might be related, and needs to be accounted for?

BPF binaries: BTF, CO-RE, and the future of BPF perf tools
http://www.brendangregg.com/blog/2020-11-04/bpf-co-re-btf-libbpf.html

Fedora does have CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF=y


-- 
Chris Murphy
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux