On 11/4/20 2:06 PM, Tom Stellard wrote: > On 11/4/20 3:57 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 03:51:40PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: >>>> Well, gcc really should have either weak or strong dependency on >>>> make too >>>> given that -flto is now used everywhere. >>> >>> The goal of this change seems to include removal of Make as a >>> dependency for the LTO wrapper used by GCC. >> >> That is definitely not something that really happened in GCC, the only >> change that has been done is to make sure that gcc -flto doesn't fail >> because of missing make, but missing make will just mean that the >> compilation will be significantly slower. >> > > My understanding was that the performance of gcc -flto when using > something other than make (e.g. ninja) to build was the same whether > or not you have make installed[1]. Is this correct? > > I thought you had to be using make to get the parallelization benefits > of -flto=auto. It will fall back to #cpu threads available if the jobserver isn't available. At least that's how it's supposed to work. jeff _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
