Re: Retiring ntp

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 10:14:05AM -0500, Steven A. Falco wrote:
> I use ntp heavily for multiple stratum 1 timeservers here.  If you drop ntp, I will have to build my own from source.  Not a big problem, but I'd personally like to see ntp stay available in Fedora.

I have few stratum-1 servers too, but I'm not running ntp.

What reference clock do you have? Unless it's something very rare, you
shouldn't need ntp for that. GPS receivers are well supported by gpsd
and ntpsec kept most of the ntpd drivers for hardware that is still
widely used.

There is also the ntp-refclock package which contains all ntpd drivers
with a thin wrapper that allows them to be used with chrony, ntpsec,
or basically any NTP server.

-- 
Miroslav Lichvar
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux