On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 10:14:05AM -0500, Steven A. Falco wrote: > On 11/2/20 9:33 AM, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > > I'm not sure how many users of ntp are there. As a replacement, we > > could package ntpsec. It is an actively maintained fork of ntp which > > has removed a lot of code and fixed or avoided most of the issues in > > ntp. What I don't like much about it is that they kept the mode-6 > > protocol of NTP, which allows traffic amplification and is still > > causing problems on Internet, but I think the code and the project are > > definitely in a better shape than ntp. I can help with the packaging > > or review, and as a comaintainer if there is a volunteer for the > > role of the primary maintainer. > > > > I use ntp heavily for multiple stratum 1 timeservers here. If you > drop ntp, I will have to build my own from source. Not a big problem, > but I'd personally like to see ntp stay available in Fedora. Would NTPSec (https://www.ntpsec.org/accomplishments.html) work for you? -- Tomasz Torcz 72->| 80->| tomek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 72->| 80->| _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
