Re: nss vs. nspr - shipping overlapping set of built binary packages?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Fabio,

Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I just noticed (because of a failed build due to NVR mismatch in an
> exact dependency) that *two* packages provide the "nspr" and
> "nspr-devel" binary packages - nss and nspr.
>
> Is there a reason for both those packages to exist, if nspr and
> nspr-devel are built from the "nss" source package, as well as from
> the "nspr" source package? The .spec files do not seem to contain an
> explanation.

The idea is to merge nspr into nss in F34+.  Although there were some
hiccups, the latest compose shouldn't have the problem.  I've just
retired nspr package in rawhide.

See the original rationale in the PR:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nss/pull-request/14
and some follow-up discussions on:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892874

Regards,
-- 
Daiki Ueno
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux