On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 8:17 AM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 10/29/20 12:43 PM, Petr Pisar wrote: > >> OTOH If the EOL date is informational only (Anna keeps postgresql:9.5 but > >> sees a warning during dnf upgrades) and the obsoletes only actually happen > >> on a specific user action (and on release boundary), great. > > > > That's how it is suspposed to work. Read "Proposed dnf behavior" in > > <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Module_Obsoletes_and_EOL>. > > Indeed, in that case a mid-release EOL makes sense, sorry for the confusion. > Ideally, DNF could have different policy modes for EOLs. By default it could throw warnings about using EOL content and still let you install it, but in a mass-managed scenario, the policy could be switched to enforcing (if you haven't already installed it, you can't). -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
