On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 17:43 +0200, Kyrre Ness Sjobak wrote: > lÃr, 07.05.2005 kl. 15.41 skrev Arjan van de Ven: > > On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 14:32 +0200, Kyrre Ness Sjobak wrote: > > > Today we use the release notes as standard homepage for all browsers, > > > instead of whatever is upstream default. Why do we do that, while > > > constantly repeating the mantra "upstream!, upstream!, upstream!"? > > > > for me the "upstream" mantra applies far more to the code than to any > > actual settings of applications. If the user can and should change > > things, I don't see an issue with Fedora doing so as shipped as well. > > > But you still ship with "spatial" nautilus, and the last discussion > about it (as far as i remember) contained a lot of "upstream is > configured with spatial as default, so we must as well"... > It's probably relevant in this case that the upstream maintainers in question are also the Red Hat maintainers ;-) Havoc -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
