Re: splitting out systemd-networkd, systemd-standalone-{sysusers,tmpfiles} subpackages in F33+

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/30/20 2:34 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
> And as I indicated earlier, most server installs have no use for
> systemd-resolved. Yes it can be disabled, but we didn't go all the
> way to virtual servers and containers to have to install things
> we will never use.

+1, & simply 'minimal' installs ...

> The ask I have is very small. When I install

and upgrade, no?

> a server via kickstart,
> I want to be able to do a minimum install, and that it should be
> possible that this does not include systemd-resolved".

it'd be nice-to-have to have that level of granularity/selection in an Anaconda minimal server install, as well.

> I have explained my use case, and I believe it is _very_ common use case.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux