Hi Zbyszek, Would it make sense to do the same for systemd-resolved ? Sounds like it has similar impact/scope wrt coreos. On Wed, 2020-09-30 at 16:26 +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Hi, > > the systemd package is getting a systemd-networkd subpackage split out > that will contain systemd-networkd, networkctl, and the associated data files. > This was requested by coreos maintainers: NetworkManager is used and skipping > systemd-networkd allows the installation footprint and potential user confusion > to be reduced a bit. (By 1.6 MB and an unknown amount, respectively.) > > Appropriate Obsoletes are added on both the main package and the new > systemd-networkd subpackage, so the systemd-networkd subpackage should > be installed on upgrades. In addition, the new subpackage has Recommends from > the main package, so it will be installed in normal installations. The split > affects installations with --setopt=install_weak_deps=False. Please make sure > to pull in systemd-networkd.rpm independently if needed. Also note that > systemd-networkd.service was preset as *disabled* in Fedora, which means that > unless it was enabled by the user, the removal of systemd-networkd wouldn't > have an effect. > > In addition, two more new subpackages are created: systemd-standalone-sysusers > and systemd-standalone-tmpfiles, with custom-linked systemd-sysusers and > systemd-tmpfiles binaries. They packages are 170kB and 260kB and pull in much > less dependencies compared to the normal systemd package (only glibc, libselinux, > and libacl). The goal here is to be able to use those packages in limited > environments where systemd itself is not necessary. > > The main systemd systemd package Obsoletes the -standalone- packages, so it > should smoothly replace them whenever it is pulled in. > > This change was done in systemd-246.6-2.fc34 in rawhide right now. (There are > some cleanups to move more files to the -networkd subpackage in the works for > 246.6-3.fc34). Please give this a spin and report any issues. > > The plan is to also do this split for F33 if no issues are noted in rawhide. > > Zbyszek > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Simo Sorce RHEL Crypto Team Red Hat, Inc _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
