On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 05:26:50PM +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 01:14:14PM -0400, Robbie Harwood wrote:
> > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >
> > > Pfff, now I'm confused. Here is a case where systemd-resolved
> > > implements the standard, and some people were unhappy because they
> > > were relying on sloppy implementations which don't follow the RFC.
> >
> > Yes, welcome to software development!
> >
> > Sometimes people care about the standard and sometimes the standard
> > isn't helpful. You can bemoan it, or belittle the users as you are
> > doing here, but *that's how it is*.
>
> I agree, but I was replying to a mail which said that systemd-resolved does
> not follow the standard. In *this* particular case, that complaint is off
> target.
How is systemd-resolved compliant with this requirement of RFC 3397 section 4:
[2] Resolve a name that contains any dots by first trying it as an
FQDN and if that fails, with the local domain name (or
searchlist if specified) appended.
when it does not resolve "dk." via DNS?
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
