On Mon, 28 Sep 2020 14:08:48 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: > It is certainly a clever setup and makes sense if your build bottleneck > is sending files around between different machines. But I don't think > this is the generic Fedora packager or developer use case. I agree and I do not propose anywhere -gsplit-dwarf. That is offtopic to this mail thread and it may look as it is related to my -fdebug-types-section proposal. It would make sense possibly only for Chromium which has no debuginfo in Fedora currently at all. And the missing debuginfo is due to DWZ because DWZ does not support -fdebug-types-section, nobody is supporting DWARF64 and Chromium .debug_info section without -fdebug-types-section would be larger than 4GB, therefore technically impossible with DWARF32. I am saying -gsplit-dwarf is probably the best solution despite right now -fdebug-types-section is the best (smallest possible file) solution. As with -gdwarf-5 -fdebug-types-section its .debug_info section is very close to 4GB and it will exceed in some time anyway. Then only -gsplit-dwarf will be possible with DWARF32 && DWARF-5. Jan _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
