Re: maybe a path forward for java and modules? [was Re: The Future of the Java Stack (also regarding ELN and RHEL)]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 01:30:26PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> 'its broke'
> 'yes I know its broke.. I just need the header files'
> 'well I need it to work' 'well fix it yourself'
> 'no that is your job.. it says you OWN THE PACKAGE'.
> 'I just own it to build foobar'
> 'too bad.. i am taking this to lwn/slashdot/twitter/reddit'

Set the owner to an alias with an explanatory name, auto-reply to bugs and
email with a bot message that explains the situation and links to more
information for people who want to help. And then if that gets taken to LWN,
*fine*.

> I think that if we are going to have 'extra' packages which are needed for
> 'core' packages, we should be explicit and own the fact that this 'package

Or some sort of ... modular ... composition system for defining and building
packages in this way? :)

-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux