On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 07:16:02AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 7:10 AM clime <clime@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Fri, 4 Sep 2020 at 12:59, clime <clime@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, 4 Sep 2020 at 12:48, Aoife Moloney <amoloney@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > However, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) [3] and the California > > > > Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) [4] basically makes the Fedora Infrastructure team > > > > (and thus Red Hat) responsible for the content hosted by any services running in > > > > our infrastructure. In other words, the Fedora Infrastructure team would be > > > > responsible to answer all GDPR/CCPA related requests and requirements for any > > > > and all services running in communishift (services that the team has 0 knowledge > > > > about, that's the whole goal of communishift). > > > > My read of this is that right now, there will be no way for the > community to run applications in Fedora Infrastructure in a way that > CPE can be divorced from it completely. That is because their goal of > running only OpenShift and then not caring about what's inside is > legally not possible. Hmm. But how, for example, cloud providers are able to provide infrastructure without taking responsibility for what's hosted? I don't think GCP is handling any GPDR/CCPA requests for clients' stuff… I don't really expect an answer. From my experience, it's impossible to get straight, yes/no, binary answer from lawyers. -- Tomasz Torcz Only gods can safely risk perfection, tomek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx it's a dangerous thing for a man. — Alia _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
