Re: Suspicious downgrades when upgrading from F32 to F33: containers-common, fuse-overlayfs, strace, thunderbird

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 08:14:38PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Do you think it would be a good idea to file bugs for those packages
> where a build for f33 was "forgotten"?
> Since I already have the "downgrade check" scripted [0] it's a simple task of:
> 
> - check if the package has attempted build for f33
> - if yes, check if it's FTBFS, and don't report a bug
> - if no build was attempted for f33, report a bug
> 
> I see ~100 downgraded *binary* packages going from fully updated f32
> to fully updated f33.
> The number of affected *source* packages is naturally lower than that.
> The script also doesn't account for packages being renamed (but in
> those cases, proper Obsoletes and Provides need to be present during
> package review, so I don't think this is a problem).

Yes, I think that would be lovely. 

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux