On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 5:46 PM Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 03/08/20 19:29 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > >On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 6:59 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> On 8/3/20 5:53 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >> > On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 05:21:58PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > >> >> Hi All, > >> >> > >> >> <grumpy mode> > >> >> I just noticed that a lot my packages got a FTBFS because of > >> >> failing to build on s390x. The first set of rebuilds failed with: > >> >> > >> >> "BuildrootError: Requested repo (1785390) is DELETED" > >> >> > >> >> The second set of rebuilds failed with: > >> >> > >> >> "rpm.error: error reading package header" > >> >> > >> >> errors. > >> >> > >> >> The last error was also seen quite a bit during the F32 mass rebuid ... > >> > > >> > I'm sorry this is happening, and it makes me very grumpy too. > >> > > >> > I have some thoughts on improvements we can make to help try and make > >> > this better, but I was under the impression it was mostly working ok for > >> > the second pass. > >> > > >> > We went from 4162 to 2833 failures, so it had to have been working at > >> > least sometime there? > >> > >> It seems for me the s390x failures on the second build are limited > >> to package names starting with A-Z and "aa*" - "an*" . > >> > >> Any chance we can get a third mass rebuild for package-names starting > >> with A-Z and "a*" ? > >> > >> Or maybe all those where the only failing platform is on s390x ? > >> > >> (no idea how easy it is to script any of this) > > > >I am already resubmitting all builds that failed in koji but that > >currently pass locally in mock with "--enablerepo local". > >So far this has reduced the number of FTBFS packages by almost 100, > >and the script is still running. > >This should take care of all packages that only failed due to infra issues. > > It looks like the %release was bumped again for these second rebuilds. > That shouldn't have been necessary, right? I wondered about this too. The answer was: Usually no, but this time, yes, because ELN: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9616#comment-668524 Fabio _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx