Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 09:43:23AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> Thanks, I guess I misunderstood because of alarmist tones.

I think it's fair to say that there's a lesson to be learned here.

> This will work just fine, writing to resolv.conf is indeed something
> advanced, and a user that can set that up will likely know how to fix
> it as well.

Additionally, Fedora's default configuration (for many, many, many years 
now) has had /etc/resolv.conf dynamically generated by NetworkManager.  
Local changes made directly to resolv.conf could (and would) get blown 
away at any time.

So users needing a non-volatile resolv.conf already have to take extra 
steps to achieve that.  Under this proposal, different (but simpler!) 
steps will be necessary to achieve the same result.

 - Solomon
-- 
Solomon Peachy			      pizza at shaftnet dot org (email&xmpp)
                                      @pizza:shaftnet dot org   (matrix)
High Springs, FL                      speachy (freenode)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux