Re: Policy for Modules in Fedora and Fedora ELN - Fedora 33 Self-Contained Change proposal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 23. 07. 20 16:53, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 23. 07. 20 16:26, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
I like Neal's proposal of "Fedora ELN may use default streams at this
time, and default streams for ELN [...] are delegated to the ELN SIG
with a report for review by FESCo on the progress of using modularity
technology in this manner" in the FESCo approval ticket.

My stand here is consistent with what I've said easier: The wider community needs to be part of this discussion, please don't just ask FESCo for this approval, either make it an esecntial part of this change proposal, submit another one or discuss this in a dedicated thread on devel.

Sorry, I've meant "what I've said earlier", "essential".

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux