Re: Enable EarlyOOM on Fedora KDE - Fedora 33 Self-Contained Change proposal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 3:15 PM John M. Harris Jr <johnmh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Saturday, July 11, 2020 11:43:29 AM MST Chris Murphy wrote:
> > It's known from the outset that earlyoom is temporary. And as the
> > resource control picture more fully develops on the desktop, both
> > GNOME and KDE, that we have an eye on a PSI based approach. It's a
> > long arc with multiple components and incremental changes. The pro and
> > con to earlyoom is the same: it's simple.
>
> How about, instead of a half-baked solution that you're *plan* to get rid of
> soon, you keep the playtesting to GNOME Spin, and don't hurt the KDE Spin in
> the process, as this Change will do?

Why wait to fix people's real problems? You don't like it, disable it.
How about stop being such a whiner all the time? It's obnoxious and
old. If you could complain about just one thing per week, it would be
an improvement.

-- 
Chris Murphy
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux