Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Make btrfs the default file system for desktop variants

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



David Sterba <dave@xxxxxxxx> 于2020年7月7日周二 下午6:09写道:
>
> > Yes, BtrFs was very unstable, but before. Every software has this process.  I
> > have talked to one of the maintainer of BtrFs, she thinks that BtrFs is ready
> > to production usage. (few years before, she is strongly against using BtrFs
> > for production purpose).
>
> May I ask who was the person you talked to? I'm asking as the active maintainer
> of btrfs. I'm familiar who does what in the community and overall status so it
> would be of my community interest to know who is speaking on behalf of the
> project, without me having even a slightest idea who that could be.
I may have take it wrongly, she is an developer at SUSE but not a maintainer.
Sorry for my mistake and that is only a personal opinion.

And that is a private talk.
>
> If you don't want to disclose the name in public, feel free to respond in
> private.
>
> Thanks.
[1] https://twitter.com/mawei_spoiler/status/1275692573999407108
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux