> Yes, BtrFs was very unstable, but before. Every software has this process. I > have talked to one of the maintainer of BtrFs, she thinks that BtrFs is ready > to production usage. (few years before, she is strongly against using BtrFs > for production purpose). May I ask who was the person you talked to? I'm asking as the active maintainer of btrfs. I'm familiar who does what in the community and overall status so it would be of my community interest to know who is speaking on behalf of the project, without me having even a slightest idea who that could be. If you don't want to disclose the name in public, feel free to respond in private. Thanks. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
